The antidrug abuse act of 1986 setup a basic framework for drug related mandatory minimum sentences. Under the 2010 law, the amount of crack that triggers the fiveyear minimum is 28 grams of crack or 500 grams of powder, and, for the tenyear minimum, 280 grams of crack and 5,000 of powder. Some experts believe crack is more likely to be abused because of its brief high and low. Until 2010, this sentencing disparity was 100 to 1, which means that while just 5 grams of crack would carry a 5year mandatory minimum. Because crack and powder cocaine are two forms of the same drug, there should not be any disparity in sentencing between crack and powder cocaine offenses the only truly fair ratio is 1. Famm supported that reform, the fair sentencing act fsa. Today, states maintain sentencing disparities between crack and powder cocaine offenses. Sentencing disparity primary sources topics in criminal. Sentencing commission statistics show that 29 percent of all crack cases from october 1, 2008, through september 30,2009, involved a weapon, compared to 16 percent for powder cocaine. The disparity started in the 1980s, when crack cocaine started to ravish urban black communities in america. The fair sentencing act amends existing laws by increasing the amounts of crack that trigger these penalties, from five grams to 28 grams for fiveyear minimum sentences and from 50 grams to 280 grams for tenyear minimum sentences.
Whereas, proposals to remove the federal mandatory minimums for crack and powder cocaine, and to otherwise eliminate the disparity for crack and powder cocaine by sentencing crack in the same manner that powder cocaine is currently sentenced, would threaten efforts to investigate and prosecute significant and violent drug offenders that deal. Falsely treating crack cocaine as 50 times more addictive than powder cocaine, as congress did more than in creating the 100toone quantity ratio, has implications beyond that of mere unfair sentencing. Congress moves to narrow sentencing disparities for crack and. Keith ellison spent 16 years as a trial lawyer dealing with hundreds of cases involving cocaine arrests. In a statement in the congressional record, breaux said he was honestly shocked to learn of the sentencing disparity between crack and powder cocaine. The antidrug abuse act of 1986 the 1986 act initiated the disparate treatment between crack and powder cocaine. Dec 27, 2008 basically, for sentencing purposes in the federal system, the relevant statute 21 u.
The house of representatives passed a bill on wednesday that would reduce the disparities between mandatory federal sentences for crack and powder cocaine violations, a. In 2010 congress passed the fair sentencing act, which repealed the mandatory minimum sentence for simple possession and reduced the sentencing disparity from 100. For example, the possession of 2 ounces of crack cocaine carried a 10 year mandatory minimum jail sentence, compared to 179 ounces of powder cocaine for the same penalty. The amount of powder cocaine necessary to trigger the sentence is still five kilos. The legislation also eliminates the mandatory minimum for simple possession of crack cocaine. Africanamericans now serve virtually as much time in prison for a drug offense 58. The 1986 law created a 100 to 1 disparity between the sentencing guidelines for crack and powder cocaine. This 100to1 disparity has frequently been cited by drug war opponents as exhibit a to buttress their claim that drug laws are racist. What is the difference between crack and powder cocaine in. Some 2020 democratic candidate argue that the sentencing disparity between crack cocaine and powder cocaine, which now sits at 18to1. To be charged with a felony, crack users needed to possess only 5 grams of the drug. Whereas, the fiveyear federal mandatory minimum sentencing amount for cocaine base hereinafter crack is five grams and the corresponding amount for cocaine hydrochloride hereinafter powder cocaine is 500 gms. Five grams of crack and 500 grams of powder cocaine now trigger a 5year mandatory minimum.
Crack cocaine sentences have long been much more harsh than those for powder cocaine. We wrote this paper to inform the public and congress about the disparities in the sentencing laws between crack and powder cocaine, which. Jul 29, 2010 the house of representatives passed a bill on wednesday that would reduce the disparities between mandatory federal sentences for crack and powder cocaine violations, a step toward ending what. Activists argue that the current rules are too harsh. The quantity distinction has also resulted in a massive sentencing disparity by race, with african americans receiving longer sentences than the mostly white and. As introduced, the fair sentencing acts provisions would have completely eliminated the sentencing disparity between crack and powder. The sentencing disparity for dealing crack and powder cocaine was 100 to 1. For instance, there are federal guidelines ensuring that people who get caught with crack are sentenced more harshly than those who are caught with powder cocaine. A comprehensive examination of the 100to1 crack versus powder cocaine sentencing disparity under which distribution of just 5 grams of crack carries a minimum 5year federal prisonsentence, while distribution of 500 grams of powder cocaine carries the same 5year mandatory minimum sentence. Sentencing commission calling for congress to change the crack cocaine law. In 2010, president obama signed the fair sentencing act, which reduced the federal penalty ratios from 100. Socioeconomically disadvantaged adults are more likely to use crack over powder cocaine, and are thus more likely to be subject to arrest. Some 2020 democratic candidate argue that the sentencing disparity between crack cocaine and powder cocaine, which now sits at 18 to 1, should be eliminated entirely. Despite the fact that the chemical structure of powder cocaine and crack cocaine is nearly identical, the punishment for crack possession or sales is far greater than that of cocaine.
Crackpowder sentencing disparity reduced by congress. The commission reported in 2004 that revising the crack cocaine thresholds would better reduce the sentencing gap than any other single policy change, and it would dramatically improve the fairness of the federal sentencing. An analysis of crack and powder penalties, march 17, 2002. To be hit with the same charge, powder cocaine users needed to be caught with 500 grams.
Congress moves to narrow sentencing disparities for crack. Both would end the disparity between powder and crack cocaine sentences. Whites get probation, blacks get a decade behind bars. The public, and members of congress, believed that crack was more addictive and dangerous to the public due to the fast, intense high that smoking it gives. New rules slashing crack cocaine sentences go into effect cnn. Download page term paper on disparity in sentencing for crack vs. Regardless of changes in the federal law, a charge of. A 2010 federal law rectified some, though not all, of the sentencing disparities. The fair sentencing act of 2010 fsa, enacted august 3, 2010, reduced the statutory penalties for crack cocaine offenses to produce an 18to1 cracktopowder drug quantity ratio. The fsa eliminated the mandatory minimum sentence for simple possession of crack cocaine and increased statutory fines. Since the law went into effect, the ratio dropped to 18to1. An end to crackpowder cocaine sentencing disparity. Sentencing commission to eliminate the disparities in federal sentencing for crack cocaine and powder cocaine offenses.
Congress compounded the inequity by making crack cocaine the only drug that carries a mandatory minimum sentence for possession, even for firsttime offenders. Cocaine is generally found in white powder form, and crack is found in a rock form that is generally white, cream, tan, or light brown. The ussc also adopts the 100to1 ratio in the federal sentencing guidelines for crack offenses. Similarly, those carrying ten grams of crack cocaine faced a. Holly mitchells senate bill 1010, which would reduce the sentence for possession of crack cocaine for sale from 35 years to 24 years, thus matching the penalties for powder. Fair sentencing act american civil liberties union. The fsa changed this socalled 100toone disparity to a disparity of 18toone. Aug 03, 2010 support for reducing the disparity with powder cocaine offenders increased with reports beginning in 2002 by the u. The federal government sought to crack down on the problem by implementing severe prison sentences for those people caught dealing crack cocaine. Federal crack cocaine sentencing the sentencing project.
Cracking the racial disparity for cocaine sentencing center. May 25, 2011 under the current law, crack users possessing only 5 grams of the drug are charged with a felony to get the same charge, powder cocaine users have to be caught with 500 grams. Regardless of changes in the federal law, a charge of crack or powder cocaine is a very serious charge. The senate crime and drugs subcommittee will hold a hearing to discuss crack. Data show racial disparity in crack sentencing us news. Under what is commonly referred to as the 100to1 cocaine sentencing disparity, it takes one hundred times as much powder cocaine as crack cocaine to trigger the federal mandatory minimums. A comprehensive examination of the 100to1 crack versus powder cocaine sentencing disparity under which distribution of just 5 grams of crack carries a. This article was prepared by s 501c4 lobbying nonprofit, the drug reform coordination network, which also pays the cost of maintaining this website. This guide highlights the incredible breadth, depth and reliability of government information on this topic. Why are crack cocaine sentences longer than those for powder. Under the current law, crack users possessing only 5 grams of the drug are charged with a felony to get the same charge, powder cocaine users have to be caught with 500 grams. Disparity in sentencing for crack vs powder cocaine. Prior to the enactment of the fsa, it took 100 times as much powder cocaine as crack cocaine to receive the same five, 10, or 20year mandatory minimum prison term.
Cocaine is typically snorted, and crack is typically smoked. How an early biden crime bill created the sentencing. Chief among these is the racial outcome of the sentencing disparity. Powder cocaine use is more evenly spread among ethnic backgrounds, and more white americans have tried powder cocaine than black americans. Nov 01, 2011 many inmates are being released starting tuesday, thanks to changes easing the disparity between crack and powder cocaine sentences. In 2010, congress passed the fair sentencing act fsa, which reduced the sentencing disparity between offenses for crack and powder cocaine from 100. Now, the ten year sentence is triggered by 280 grams of crack instead of 50. What is crack cocaine differences between crack and cocaine. This disparity between crack and powder cocaine was driven by fear, instead of by research, of the intensity and perceived dangers of crack. This 100to1 disparity has frequently been cited by drug war opponents. The new law significantly reduces the cocaine sentencing quantity disparity from 100 to 1 to 18 to 1 by raising the quantity of crack cocaine necessary to trigger the five and tenyear mandatory minimum sentences first set in 1986. The 100to1 crack cocaine to powder cocaine quantity ratio is a primary cause of the growing disparity between sentences for black and white federal defendants, the commission wrote. Another difference between crack and cocaine relates to the high produced.
Jun 11, 2016 in the mid 80s, congress passed the antidrug abuse act of 1986. That resulted in a disparity with powder of about 18 to 1. Crackpowder sentencing disparity reduced by congress huffpost. Attempts to change the disparity edit legal challenges edit. For example, possession of just 5 grams of crack cocaine about a thimble full triggers a five year mandatory minimum sentence. In the mid 80s, congress passed the antidrug abuse act of 1986.
Now that disparity is being reduced from 100to1 to 18to1. This is often what people are referring to when they mention drug related sentencing disparities. Jan 29, 2019 crack and power cocaine sentencing disparities. Many inmates are being released starting tuesday, thanks to changes easing the disparity between crack and powder cocaine sentences. New drug law narrows crack, powder cocaine sentencing gap. Similarly, those carrying ten grams of crack cocaine. Basically, for sentencing purposes in the federal system, the relevant statute 21 u. Feb 19, 2015 socioeconomically disadvantaged adults are more likely to use crack over powder cocaine, and are thus more likely to be subject to arrest. Jul 28, 2019 the 100to1 crack cocaine to powder cocaine quantity ratio is a primary cause of the growing disparity between sentences for black and white federal defendants, the commission wrote. Senator dick durbin, the sentencing disparity between crack and powder cocaine has contributed to the imprisonment of african americans at six times the rate of whites and to the united states position as the worlds leader in incarcerations. American drug laws make it pretty clear that our legal system thinks crack is extra whack.
Crack cocaine sentencing policy prison policy initiative. Sentencing commission statistics show that 29 percent of all crack cases from october 1, 2008, through september 30,2009, involved a weapon, compared to. Congress compounded the inequity by making crack cocaine the only drug that carries a mandatory minimum. So, the federal law still imposes a different and harsher sentence for crack cocaine possession than it does for powder cocaine possession, but the disparity is not nearly as great as under the 1986 act. This disparity between crack and powder cocaine was driven by fear, instead of by research, of the intensity and perceived dangers of crack cocaine. Clinton signs bill to disapprove of equalizing crackpowder. Cracking the racial disparity for cocaine sentencing. This report addresses disparities in cocaine sentencing in states and documents efforts at the federal and state level to correct these injustices. Regrettably, the majority opted instead to perpetuate these discriminatory laws by passing and reporting out h. Crack and cocaine also differ in the manner in which they are used. Before this law was passed, the united states had a 100to1 crack to powder cocaine sentencing disparity. The answer to the problem presented by this wide difference in penalties is not to lower penalties for selling crack cocaine but to increase the penalties for selling powder cocaine, the. The figures for the 6,020 powder cocaine cases are far less skewed. The sentencing disparities between crack and cocaine attn.
Clinton signs bill to disapprove of equalizing crack. Before this law was passed, the united states had a 100to1 cracktopowder cocaine sentencing disparity. Why are crack cocaine sentences longer than those for. Congress is considering a bill to change drug laws that punish crack cocaine violations more severely than those for powder cocaine. The 1986 antidrug abuse act mandated a minimum sentence of five years without parole for possession of 5 grams of crack cocaine while it mandated the same penalty for possession of 500 grams of. New rules slashing crack cocaine sentences go into effect. For more information on federal laws on cocaine possession, see cocaine. May 25, 2011 to be charged with a felony, crack users needed to possess only 5 grams of the drug. Support for reducing the disparity with powder cocaine offenders increased with reports beginning in 2002 by the u.
363 1456 1553 122 663 617 292 741 559 1276 1069 91 19 757 628 1072 382 1283 84 649 6 314 1436 21 1295 646 509 886